Text to 3D and image to 3D conversion: practical workflows for creators in 2025

 Rapid 3D model prototyping with AI integration for faster concept development and iteration

Generating 3D models from text descriptions or images has transformed how creators approach 3D design. What once required hours of manual modeling can now happen in seconds, opening new possibilities for rapid prototyping, creative experimentation, and bringing ideas to physical reality through 3D printing.

But generation tools are most powerful when you understand how to use them effectively. Random prompts produce random results. Structured workflows that combine generation with traditional modeling create consistent, professional outcomes.

This guide shows you exactly how to leverage text to 3D and image to 3D conversion for real projects, whether you're designing custom jewelry, rapid prototypes, or unique 3D printed gifts.

Understanding generation workflows

Generation tools transform descriptions or reference images into 3D geometry. Unlike traditional modeling where you manually create every surface, generation interprets your input and produces complete 3D meshes ready for editing.

The technology works through trained models that understand relationships between visual concepts and 3D forms. When you describe "a coffee mug with geometric patterns," the system recognizes what mugs look like, how geometric patterns should wrap around cylindrical surfaces, and what topology works for 3D objects.

Text to 3D generation explained

Text to 3D converts written descriptions directly into 3D meshes. You type what you want to create, and the system generates geometry matching your description. The process happens in seconds, giving you a starting point that would take hours to model manually.

Text generation excels at conceptual work where you know what you want but need quick iterations to find the right form. It's particularly valuable for organic shapes, character concepts, and abstract designs where precise measurements matter less than overall aesthetic.

Best applications for text to 3D:

  • Character and creature concepts for refinement
  • Organic forms like plants, animals, or natural objects
  • Abstract sculptures and artistic pieces
  • Quick concept visualization before detailed modeling
  • Reference models for complex manual modeling projects

Image to 3D conversion explained

Image to 3D conversion transforms 2D images into three-dimensional meshes. Upload a reference photo, illustration, or design, and the system interprets depth, form, and structure to create volumetric geometry.

This workflow particularly shines when you have existing visual references. Product photos, concept art, sketches, and design mockups all become jumping-off points for 3D models. According to research from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, image-to-3D systems now achieve geometric accuracy suitable for manufacturing applications when given high-quality reference images.

Best applications for image to 3D:

  • Converting product photos into 3D models
  • Transforming concept art into sculptable geometry
  • Recreating objects from reference images
  • Building models from hand-drawn sketches
  • Creating design variations from existing products

Choosing the right approach

Your project determines whether text or image input works better. Text descriptions give you complete creative control without needing reference images. Image conversion works when you already have visual references that capture your desired result.

Many successful projects combine both approaches. Generate initial concepts from text, refine the most promising results, convert the refined images to 3D, then polish the geometry with traditional modeling tools. This hybrid workflow leverages each method's strengths while minimizing weaknesses.

Effective prompting for text to 3D

Text to 3D generation quality depends heavily on how you structure your descriptions. Vague prompts like "make me something cool" produce unpredictable results. Specific, structured descriptions consistently generate usable geometry.

Core prompt components

Effective prompts include four essential elements: subject, style, detail level, and structural considerations.

Subject definition states exactly what object you're creating. "Dragon" is vague. "Small European-style dragon with bat wings and four legs" is specific. The more precisely you define your subject, the more accurately generation matches your vision.

Style specification controls aesthetic direction. Realistic, stylized, geometric, organic, minimalist, ornate โ€” style descriptors dramatically affect output. "Geometric low-poly style" produces very different results than "highly detailed realistic texture."

Detail level tells the system how complex to make the geometry. "Simple" or "detailed" guide whether you get basic shapes or intricate surfaces. For 3D printing, moderate detail often works best โ€” enough visual interest without creating unprintable thin features.

Structural considerations address printability when relevant. Including phrases like "solid base" or "printable without supports" helps generation systems create geometry that works for physical manufacturing.

Practical prompt examples

Let's compare weak and strong prompts for common projects:

Weak prompt: "Make a vase"

Strong prompt: "Cylindrical ceramic vase, 20cm tall, smooth surface with subtle wave texture, wide stable base, minimalist modern style"

The strong version specifies form (cylindrical), material aesthetic (ceramic), dimensions (20cm), surface treatment (smooth with wave texture), structural requirements (stable base), and style (minimalist modern). Each detail guides the generation toward printable, usable geometry.

Weak prompt: "Create a toy robot"

Strong prompt: "Friendly toy robot character, blocky geometric shapes, rounded edges for safety, stable wide feet, simplified mechanical details, suitable for resin printing at 10cm height"

This strong prompt defines personality (friendly), aesthetic (geometric with rounded edges), safety considerations (rounded edges), structural stability (wide feet), detail level (simplified), and manufacturing requirements (resin printing at specific size).

Iterative refinement strategy

First generation attempts rarely produce perfect results. Professional workflows treat initial outputs as starting points for refinement through iteration.

Start with a basic prompt describing your subject clearly. Evaluate the first result. What matches your vision? What needs adjustment? Modify your prompt to address specific issues, then generate again.

Common refinements include:

  • Adding style descriptors if aesthetic doesn't match expectations
  • Specifying structural features if stability looks questionable
  • Adjusting detail level if geometry is too simple or too complex
  • Including size references if proportions seem off
  • Adding material descriptions if surface treatment needs changing

This iterative process typically requires three to five generation cycles to reach optimal results. Each iteration refines your prompt based on previous outputs, progressively moving toward your target design.

Image to 3D workflow techniques

Converting images to 3D geometry requires understanding how systems interpret 2D information and what makes good reference material. Image quality, composition, and content dramatically affect conversion results.

Preparing reference images

The best reference images for 3D conversion share specific characteristics. Clear subject isolation with minimal background clutter helps the system focus on your intended object. Even lighting without harsh shadows or bright highlights preserves form information. Neutral backgrounds โ€” white, gray, or solid colors โ€” prevent visual confusion.

Front-facing or three-quarter views capture dimensional information better than extreme angles. Close crops that fill the frame with your subject provide maximum detail for conversion. High resolution matters โ€” images should be at least 1024 pixels on the shortest side for quality results.

Image preparation checklist:

  • Remove or minimize background elements
  • Ensure even, shadowless lighting when possible
  • Crop tightly around your subject
  • Use neutral background colors
  • Provide adequate resolution (1024px minimum)
  • Choose angles that show form clearly

Multi-angle approach

Single images limit the 3D information available for conversion. Multiple angles capture more complete geometric understanding. Front, side, and three-quarter views together provide much more dimensional data than any single perspective.

When working with multiple references, consistency matters. Use the same lighting, background, and scale across all images. This helps the system understand that different views show the same object from different angles rather than separate objects.

Professional product designers commonly create image sets: front view, right side view, top view, and one or two three-quarter angles. This provides comprehensive geometric information for accurate conversion.

Style and aesthetic control

Generated meshes inherit aesthetic qualities from reference images. Realistic photos produce realistic-looking 3D models. Illustrated or stylized images generate geometry matching that aesthetic. You can use this intentionally to control the final style.

For realistic products, use clean product photography as reference. For stylized results, create illustrated versions of your concept first, then convert those illustrations to 3D. For geometric or abstract aesthetics, start with graphic design compositions showing your desired shapes and patterns.

This two-step workflow โ€” creating the right 2D reference, then converting it โ€” gives you powerful control over final aesthetics while leveraging generation tools' speed.

Combining generation with traditional modeling

Generation tools excel at creating starting points. Traditional modeling tools excel at precision refinement. The most effective workflows combine both approaches, using generation for rapid concept creation and manual modeling for final polish.

The hybrid workflow

Start by generating several concept variations using text or image inputs. Don't aim for perfection in generated results. Look for the version that best captures your overall vision, even if details need work.

Import your chosen generated mesh into Womp's browser-based editor. Now you have quick access to traditional modeling tools for refinement. Womp's liquid modeling system lets you blend, deform, and reshape generated geometry intuitively without complex technical knowledge.

Adjust proportions using scale and deformation tools. Add precise details like holes, text, or patterns using Boolean operations. Refine surfaces using smooth and sharpen functions. Fix structural issues for 3D printing by thickening walls or adding drainage holes.

This hybrid approach combines generation's speed with modeling's precision. You skip the tedious early stages of creating basic forms, jumping straight to the creative refinement work that differentiates your design.

When to generate versus when to model manually

Generation works best for conceptual forms, organic shapes, and rapid exploration of multiple design directions. Traditional modeling works best for precise technical features, mechanical parts with specific dimensions, and architectural elements requiring exact measurements.

Smart workflows use each approach where it excels. Generate organic character bodies, then manually model precise technical details like hinges or connectors. Create multiple generated variations of abstract sculptures, then use manual tools to add text, logos, or specific dimensional features.

Product designers particularly benefit from hybrid workflows. Generate the overall product form to explore aesthetic directions quickly. Once you select a direction, manually model functional features like button placements, mounting holes, or assembly mechanisms that require engineering precision.

Quality control for printability

Generated meshes don't automatically meet 3D printing requirements. Successful prints require minimum wall thickness, proper drainage for hollow parts, and structurally sound geometry. Manual refinement addresses these manufacturing constraints.

Womp's integrated print preparation automatically checks structural health and flags potential issues. You'll see warnings about thin walls, disconnected geometry, or problematic overhangs. Address these warnings before ordering prints to ensure success.

Common printability refinements include:

  • Thickening walls to meet 1.2mm minimum requirements
  • Adding drainage holes to hollow sections
  • Creating stable bases for vertical objects
  • Simplifying extremely fine details that won't print cleanly
  • Connecting floating elements to main geometry

According to University of Michigan's 3D Lab, proper pre-print validation reduces failed prints by over 80%, making these refinements essential for efficient production.

Generation strategies for 3D printing projects

Using generation tools specifically for physical manufacturing requires different approaches than creating digital-only models. Printability, material behavior, and post-processing capabilities all influence how you generate and refine designs.

Designing for SLA resin printing

SLA resin printing creates smooth, detailed parts perfect for complex geometries. When generating models for SLA printing, consider resin's material properties and the printing process's capabilities.

Thin features print successfully down to 1.2mm minimum wall thickness. Include this constraint in text prompts: "suitable for resin printing, minimum 1.2mm walls." For image conversion, choose references showing substantial, printable features rather than paper-thin details.

Hollow sections reduce material costs significantly but require drainage holes. When generating hollow objects, prompt for "drainage holes at lowest points" or manually add them during refinement. Each enclosed air pocket needs at least one drainage hole to allow uncured resin to escape during post-processing.

Womp's clear resin material offers exceptional detail capture and smooth surfaces, ideal for jewelry, miniatures, and display pieces. Transparent materials showcase internal geometry beautifully, making hollow designs with interesting internal structures particularly striking.

Designing for prototyping plastic

White prototyping plastic (WPP) provides durable, opaque parts ideal for functional prototypes and testing. Generation strategies for WPP focus on structural strength and functional features.

WPP supports moderate detail but works best with simpler geometries than resin. When prompting, emphasize "solid construction" and "durable design" to bias generation toward robust geometry. For image conversion, use clean reference images showing substantial forms rather than delicate details.

Functional parts need precise dimensional accuracy. After generating basic forms, manually model any features requiring exact sizes โ€” mounting holes, connector interfaces, or mating surfaces. Generation creates the aesthetic shell; manual modeling adds functional precision.

Test prints identify design issues before committing to final versions. Generate and print small test sections first, especially for complex assemblies or precise fits. This iterative physical testing catches problems that digital inspection misses.

Size optimization strategies

Print costs scale with material volume. Smaller designs cost less, making size optimization crucial for budget-conscious projects. Generated models often default to larger dimensions than necessary.

Start by defining target size in your text prompts: "small jewelry pendant, 3cm maximum dimension" guides generation toward appropriate scale. For image conversion, include size references in your reference image or specify dimensions during generation.

Womp's print preparation shows exact dimensions and costs. After importing generated geometry, scale your model to the smallest practical size for your application. Many designs work perfectly at 50-70% of their initial generated size, dramatically reducing costs.

Hollowing provides additional savings without compromising external appearance. Solid geometry uses maximum material. Hollowed versions with 2-3mm walls maintain strength while using 50-80% less material. For display pieces and non-functional objects, aggressive hollowing maximizes savings.

Design variations for testing

Generation tools excel at creating multiple variations quickly. Use this capability to generate diverse options for comparison and testing before committing to final prints.

Create a series of variations with different:

  • Proportions (tall vs. wide, slender vs. chunky)
  • Detail levels (minimal vs. ornate)
  • Structural approaches (solid vs. skeletal, smooth vs. textured)
  • Style directions (geometric vs. organic, realistic vs. stylized)

Print small test versions of your top three to five variations. Physical samples reveal qualities impossible to judge from digital previews โ€” how light interacts with surfaces, actual scale perception, tactile qualities of different geometries.

This variation-and-test workflow costs more initially but prevents expensive mistakes. Printing three small test versions costs less than printing one large version that doesn't meet your needs.

Advanced techniques for professional results

Basic generation workflows produce functional results. Advanced techniques leveraging generation tools' full capabilities produce professional-quality outputs competitive with fully manual modeling.

Prompt engineering for consistency

Professional projects require consistent aesthetics across multiple related designs. Prompt engineering techniques help maintain visual coherence when generating different objects for the same project.

Establish a base prompt template capturing your project's aesthetic: "minimalist geometric design, matte finish, rounded edges, suitable for resin printing." Use this template as the foundation for all project-related generations, adding specific object details to the end.

Base template: "minimalist geometric design, matte finish, rounded edges, suitable for resin printing"

Specific objects:

  • Base template + "coffee mug, cylindrical body, comfortable handle"
  • Base template + "plate, shallow circular form, subtle rim detail"
  • Base template + "bowl, hemispherical form, stable foot ring"

This templated approach maintains consistent style while allowing object-specific variations. All generated pieces feel related because they share aesthetic foundations.

Reference image libraries

Building a personal reference library improves image-to-3D conversion quality dramatically. Collect high-quality reference images organized by category: forms, textures, styles, technical details.

When starting new projects, combine multiple references through text descriptions: "design combining the form of [reference A] with the surface treatment of [reference B]." This hybrid referencing creates unique results while maintaining quality.

Professional designers maintain extensive reference libraries categorized by:

  • Geometric forms and proportions
  • Surface treatments and textures
  • Structural details and mechanical features
  • Style references and aesthetic directions
  • Technical drawings and dimensional standards

Batch generation workflows

Projects requiring multiple similar objects benefit from batch generation approaches. Instead of generating objects one at a time, create entire sets through systematic prompt variations.

Generate a base object successfully. Note exactly which prompt elements produced good results. Create a systematic variation strategy changing one element at a time:

  • Size variations: small, medium, large versions
  • Detail variations: minimal, moderate, ornate versions
  • Function variations: different configurations of the same basic form

Process the entire batch through generation, then review all results together. This batch approach reveals subtle prompt effects and produces comprehensive option sets for final selection.

Post-generation enhancement checklist

Before considering any generated model complete, run through this professional enhancement checklist:

Structural validation:

  • Verify minimum 1.2mm wall thickness throughout
  • Check for disconnected geometry or floating elements
  • Ensure stable base and proper weight distribution
  • Add support considerations for complex overhangs

Surface quality:

  • Smooth rough surfaces using blur or smoothing tools
  • Sharpen edges that should be crisp
  • Remove generation artifacts like small surface bumps
  • Refine topology for even polygon distribution

Detail refinement:

  • Add or enhance small features that generation missed
  • Include text, logos, or custom elements
  • Create precise technical features requiring exact dimensions
  • Add functional elements like holes or connectors

Print preparation:

  • Scale to target size and verify dimensions
  • Hollow if appropriate and add drainage holes
  • Orient model for optimal print quality
  • Run final structural health checks

Real project workflows

Theoretical workflows differ from practical application. Here are complete workflows for actual project types showing exactly how to leverage generation tools effectively.

Custom jewelry design workflow

Jewelry requires detailed aesthetics within constrained sizes, making generation tools particularly valuable for concept creation.

Step 1: Generate concept variationsPrompt: "elegant ring design, organic flowing forms, art nouveau style, suitable for resin printing, 2cm diameter, comfortable band"

Generate 5-8 variations using this prompt. Review for overall aesthetic appeal, ignoring minor details. Select the version best capturing your desired style.

Step 2: Refine for wearabilityImport chosen design into Womp. Check band thickness โ€” needs 1.8mm minimum for strength. Smooth internal surfaces for comfort. Verify ring size matches target diameter precisely.

Step 3: Add custom detailsInclude personalized elements: initials, dates, or small decorative features. Use Boolean operations for text cutouts or pattern additions. Ensure all added elements maintain minimum wall thickness.

Step 4: Print test versionOrder small test print in clear resin. Verify fit, comfort, and structural integrity. Assess how light interacts with design. Make refinements based on physical testing.

Step 5: Final productionRefine design based on test results. Order final version. Consider batch-creating size variations for different wearers using scale adjustments.

Product prototype workflow

Prototyping requires both aesthetic appeal and functional accuracy. Generation handles aesthetics; manual modeling adds precision.

Step 1: Generate form studies Create text prompts exploring different aesthetic directions for your product. Generate multiple variations: "modern minimalist product case, smooth surfaces, integrated handle, rounded corners, suitable for WPP printing" versus "industrial technical product case, geometric paneling, structural ribs, mechanical aesthetic, suitable for WPP printing."

Step 2: Select and combine elements No single generation perfectly matches requirements. Select the best base form from one variation. Identify superior detail elements from other versions. Plan how to combine these elements.

Step 3: Manual refinement Import chosen base into Womp. Manually model precise functional features: mounting holes at exact positions, connector ports with specific dimensions, assembly interfaces with tight tolerances. Generation created aesthetic shell; you're adding functional precision.

Step 4: Structural validation Ensure all walls meet 1.8mm minimum for WPP durability. Add internal support ribs if the design has large flat surfaces. Test assembly interfaces with simple test prints of critical sections.

Step 5: Iteration cycle Print full prototype in WPP material. Test functional requirements. Document what works and what needs adjustment. Refine model addressing specific issues. Print again. Iterate until all requirements are met.

Decorative design workflow

Decorative pieces prioritize visual impact. Generation excels at creative forms without functional constraints.

Step 1: Visual exploration Generate liberally. Create 15-20 variations exploring different styles, forms, and aesthetic directions. Don't filter at this stage โ€” unexpected results often inspire creative directions.

Step 2: Aesthetic selection Review all variations. Select three to five that capture compelling visual qualities. Print small test versions at 5-7cm height to evaluate physical presence and light interaction.

Step 3: Scale optimization Determine final display size based on intended use and budget. Decorative pieces can be surprisingly small while maintaining impact โ€” a 10cm sculpture often provides the same visual impact as a 15cm version at 40% lower cost.

Step 4: Hollowing strategy Decorative pieces rarely need solid construction. Hollow aggressively with 2mm walls to reduce material costs. Add drainage holes at least 3mm diameter. Create interesting internal geometry that shows through translucent materials.

Step 5: Surface finishing After printing, consider post-processing options. Womp's resin prints arrive ready for painting, coating, or metal plating. Plan post-processing during design โ€” add texture intentionally or create smooth surfaces for clean painting.

Troubleshooting common generation issues

Generation tools occasionally produce unexpected results. Understanding common issues and their solutions speeds up workflows and reduces frustration.

Geometric problems

Thin or fragile sections: Generated geometry sometimes includes walls too thin for printing. Solution: manually thicken problem areas to 1.2mm minimum, or regenerate with prompts emphasizing "durable construction" or "thick walls suitable for printing."

Disconnected elements: Floating parts or separated sections won't print as single objects. Solution: use Boolean union operations to connect elements, or manually build connector geometry bridging gaps.

Inverted surfaces: Occasional surface normals face inward, creating rendering and printing problems. Solution: flip normals using mesh editing tools, or regenerate with adjusted prompts emphasizing "solid volumetric geometry."

Complex internal geometry: Sometimes generation creates unnecessary internal structures invisible from outside. Solution: simplify meshes removing internal elements, or hollow the model entirely and remove interior complexity.

Aesthetic mismatches

Wrong style: Generated aesthetics don't match intention despite prompt clarity. Solution: add more specific style descriptors, reference particular art movements or design eras, or provide image references showing desired aesthetic direction.

Incorrect proportions: Overall dimensions or relationships between elements feel off. Solution: include specific proportion descriptions in prompts ("twice as tall as wide"), provide reference images with clear dimensional relationships, or manually adjust proportions post-generation.

Surface quality issues: Textures too rough, too smooth, or showing generation artifacts. Solution: adjust detail level in prompts, use smoothing tools post-generation, or try different generation models specializing in different surface qualities.

Missing details: Expected features don't appear in generated geometry. Solution: be more explicit in prompts about required features, break complex designs into multiple generations assembling final version, or add details manually post-generation.

Scale and sizing challenges

Disproportionate elements: Parts don't relate properly to each other size-wise. Solution: provide size references in prompts ("handle should be 1/4 total height"), generate separate elements at consistent scales then combine them, or manually scale elements post-generation.

Unprintable size: Generated models default to impractical dimensions for printing. Solution: always specify target size in prompts, scale imported geometry to practical dimensions immediately, or generate with "small format suitable for desktop printing" in prompts.

Privacy and data usage

When using generation tools, understanding how your data is handled matters. Womp's generation system uses off-the-shelf, publicly available generation models rather than proprietary trained systems.

Data collection: Womp doesn't collect your prompts, generated content, or designs for model training purposes. Your creative work remains private. Generation requests process through third-party model APIs without storing your input data.

No training on user content: Your designs never become training data. Many platforms train their systems on user-generated content, potentially exposing your creative work to replication. Womp explicitly avoids this practice.

Model sources: All generation models come from publicly available sources. No proprietary Womp-specific training means you're using the same model foundations available across the industry, ensuring broad compatibility and avoiding platform lock-in.

Intellectual property: You retain full rights to generated designs. Models produced using generation tools belong to you completely. Use them commercially, modify them freely, or keep them private โ€” Womp makes no claims to your creative output.

This privacy-respecting approach lets you explore generation tools confidently without concerns about data mining or intellectual property complications.

Future of generation workflows

Generation technology continues advancing rapidly. Understanding coming developments helps plan long-term creative strategies and tool investments.

Emerging capabilities

Current text-to-3D and image-to-3D systems represent early-stage technology with significant room for improvement. According to Stanford's AI Lab, next-generation models will achieve photorealistic texture quality and precise geometric control comparable to manual modeling.

Multi-modal input combinations show particular promise. Future systems will seamlessly blend text descriptions, reference images, and rough 3D sketches, interpreting intent across multiple input types simultaneously. This will enable more intuitive creative direction and more accurate results.

Real-time generation refinement will replace current generate-review-regenerate cycles. Interactive adjustment of generated geometry through direct manipulation, slider controls, or conversational refinement will make iteration dramatically faster.

Integration with traditional workflows

Generation tools increasingly integrate with conventional modeling software rather than replacing it. Professional 3D packages add generation capabilities alongside traditional tools, treating generation as one more technique in comprehensive toolkits.

This integration trend benefits creators. You'll access generation and manual modeling in unified interfaces, seamlessly transitioning between approaches mid-project. No more exporting, importing, or switching between separate applications.

Hybrid tools specifically designed for generation-plus-refinement workflows will emerge. These systems will optimize the entire process from initial generation through final polish, providing specialized interfaces for both rapid concept creation and precise technical modeling.

Implications for creators

Generation tools won't replace modeling skills โ€” they'll augment them. Creators who understand both generation and traditional modeling will produce higher-quality work faster than those relying on either approach alone.

Design thinking becomes more important as technical execution becomes easier. When creating forms requires seconds instead of hours, your creative vision and aesthetic judgment differentiate your work. Strong conceptual skills and clear design intentions matter more than ever.

Learning curve requirements shift. Instead of mastering complex modeling software interfaces, creators need effective prompt engineering, strong visual references, and good design fundamentals. Technical knowledge remains valuable but is no longer the primary barrier to creation.

Start using generation tools effectively

Text to 3D and image to 3D conversion tools transform creative workflows when used strategically. They excel at rapid concept generation, aesthetic exploration, and creating starting points for detailed refinement.

Successful workflows combine generation with traditional modeling. Use generation where it excels โ€” quick concept creation and organic forms. Use manual modeling where it excels โ€” precise dimensions and technical features. This hybrid approach produces professional results faster than either technique alone.

Womp's integrated platform provides both generation capabilities and comprehensive modeling tools in a single browser-based interface. Generate concepts using Womp Spark, refine them with liquid modeling, prepare them for manufacturing with integrated print tools, and order physical prints โ€” all without leaving your browser.

Start experimenting with generation workflows today. Create concept variations rapidly. Test different aesthetic directions. Build hybrid workflows combining generation speed with modeling precision. Let generation tools handle tedious initial creation while you focus on creative refinement that distinguishes your work.

The future of 3D creation combines human creativity with computational generation. Master both sides of this partnership and you'll create work impossible with either approach alone.

Ready to explore generation workflows? Visit Womp to start creating with integrated generation and modeling tools, or check out our beginner's guide to 3D modeling to learn fundamental techniques that complement generation workflows.

Related resources: Discover how to design for 3D printing, explore liquid modeling techniques, or learn about rapid prototyping workflows for product development.